I am a big lover of Jodi Picoults books. Her dramatic plot twists and captivating writing style keeps me hooked until the very last word. I give this book four stars, I was disappointed with the writing style, but found its content and theme fascinating, and it is an incredibly unique, thought-provoking topic, not something just anyone could come up with.
My Sisters Keeper is a reference to the bible. Caine has just murdered Able, both of which are sons of Adam and Eve. God asks Cain where Able is to which he replies "I am not my brothers keeper", i.e I do not know. This parallels the story of the Fitzgerald family, Kate has leukemia. Her sister, Anna was born with a purpose, to be spare parts for her sister, and save her life. But Anna decides she’s had enough, and hires a lawyer to sue her parents for the rights to her own body. She will no longer be her Sisters Keeper.
As the book was written from many characters
perspectives, I found myself flipping sides, unable to come to a clear decision until the very end, a clever tactic in such a controversial book. I understood Saras reasons
for using Anna to save Kates life, and at times found myself thinking that Anna
was ever so slightly selfish for not thinking of Kates wellbeing. However, at times her mum, Sara, came across as hysterical and only thinking about Kates wellbeing, for
example when she wouldn’t let Anna go to residential camp in case Kate went into relapse.
Toward the end, though, once I realised it was Kates wish to be let go, I
sympathized completely with Anna. I felt that she should have told the
truth from the beginning, then she wouldn't have come off quite so self-centred.
The decision of whether or not to use
the body for medical purposes, however old the donor might be, lies with them
alone. It’s not up to the parent, and the sick child would never be upset or
feel betrayed if she decided not to go ahead with it. Being chronically ill
myself, once I found out it was Kates wish not to receive the kidney, there was
a very easy answer. Of course if I was a mother of a sick child then I might
have a different view, any parent would do anything to keep their child alive,
whatever the cost. Its very difficult to give equal attention to
children when one is chronically ill and the other isn’t as dependent on you. The
patient feels guilty for taking all their parents time and effort, so when the opportunity comes to take the pressure off the sibling, of course they'll take it. And parents are going to fight it,
they want their child alive, it’s their job. But just how far do they go?
I think Picoult was clever in not including Kates
perspective until right at the end. I would have liked
things to have moved quicker, a lot of detail cut out, and a much more concise
story. I also found the sub plot of Campbell and Julia falling in love was
unnessesary, I felt it was clichéd and irrelevant.
Although the ending was unexpected, I was
disappointed by it. I felt like the whole purpose of the story was that Anna wanted her
voice was heard in a place where she felt like she was invisible. I wanted
Anna to finally be heard, but the ethical and moral aspects of the story were
completely abandoned. I feel Picoult took the easy way out in the end.
This is one of the rare moments where I actually say that I
much preferred the movie than the book. I really find it much more
touching. I didn’t cry at the book as there was too much technical jargon, but
I did at the film as the ending had much more impact.
The book made incredibly grateful for my own
sister. She does an awful lot for me when I’m sick, and she has to deal with
not having her voice heard, and all the attention going on me, but until
something brings it up, (like the book ‘Wonder’ by R.J Palacio), you don’t think about
the effect it has on everyone else. I know she’d do anything for me, but I
would never want her giving up her childhood for me.
Hello lovely, thank you for leaving a comment on my blog as it means I have found yours, I've had a good read of your posts, and you seem like a lovely inspirational character. Your thoughts on this book are really thought provoking, and you have definitely inspired me! xxx
ReplyDeleteI've also nominated you for a liebster award, so check it out! xxx
ReplyDeleteSophie, thankyou so so much! You have really turned my day around. I read your answers from your own nomination, I'm very jealous of your hair - my own hair is always super frizzy and 'big'… haha! I can't wait for more book reviews/recommendations from you! Also, your photos are beautiful, so artfully creative. <3
DeleteGreat review! I've only read one other Jodi Picoult book before and that was House Rules and I loved it and I've always wanted to read this as I've seen the film and thought it was great (however I have heard that they completely changed the ending?)
ReplyDeleteI love books like this though because they're open to such a debate and I love the ethical side of things (I remember having a debate about it in ethics class in school actually!)
Anyway, nice blog! I followed you on Twitter too :)
My blog is www.jennyinneverland.wordpress.com if you wanna take a look!
Happy blogging! xxx
Thankyou Jenny! Will definitely be having a look through your blog!
DeleteYes, they did change the ending completely, and I much preferred it to the book ending, I must admit! It's worth reading though because your opinion might be different to mine. I'm in a book club and we've discussed her books, it definitely has inspired some very heated debates! What's your opinion on ivf 'medical' babies?
I've also read 'The Pact' by Picoult, and liked the writing in it a lot more, and have '19 Minutes' and 'Picture Perfect' to read next, I'm very slowly working my way through her collection - as well as everything else I want to read.. I wish I could stop time sometimes and just read through 10 books in a day then I'd have more time to read more books… I swear I add a new book (or 10) to my TBR list every day!